Re: [AMBER] AMBER11 installation

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:19:47 -0500

Yes, it is fine. Does that link also explain why it is expected?

--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
On Feb 3, 2012, at 12:53 AM, Hirdesh Kumar <hirdesh.iitd.gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to install AMBER11 with AmberTool1.5. The AmberTool1.5 patch
> was applied successfully without any error but while patching Amber11
> bugfix i got following error..
> Do I need to consider this error or skip it for now.
> 
> 
> patching file AmberTools/src/configure
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 19.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 370.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 504.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 633.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 643.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 657.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 989.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 1022.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 1058.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 1310.
> Hunk #11 FAILED at 1344.
> Hunk #12 FAILED at 1492.
> Hunk #13 FAILED at 1546.
> 13 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> AmberTools/src/configure.rej
> 
> I googled the error and found that the error is not serious. (
> http://archive.ambermd.org/201106/0624.html). Shall proceed further?
> 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Hirdesh
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Feb 02 2012 - 22:30:03 PST
Custom Search