Re: [AMBER] ICST-Amber Install

From: co nguyentruong <nguoithamdo.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 19:57:38 +0700

Dear

Thank you very much, but how about this test:

Possible FAILURE: check FINAL_RESULTS_MMPBSA.dat.dif
/export/apps/amber111.4/test/mmpbsa_py
99c99
< EPB -3305.9807 18.9403
13.3928
---
> EPB                      -3305.9472               18.9343
13.3886
102,103c102,103
< G solv                   -3238.4981               18.9458
13.3967
< TOTAL                   -22209.0959               20.7614
14.6805
---
> G solv                   -3238.4646               18.9399
13.3925
> TOTAL                   -22209.0624               20.7673
14.6847
109c109
< EPB                      -3330.8514               16.7749
11.8617
---
> EPB                      -3330.9587               16.9716
12.0007
112,113c112,113
< G solv                   -3261.8320               16.7782
11.8640
< TOTAL                   -22129.0486               21.4524
15.1691
---
> G solv                   -3261.9392               16.9749
12.0031
> TOTAL                   -22129.1559               21.2557
15.0300
119c119
< EPB                        -35.6427                0.7251
0.5128
---
> EPB                        -35.6425                0.7250
0.5127
122,123c122,123
< G solv                     -32.3630                0.7252
0.5128
< TOTAL                      -40.8940                2.5242
1.7849
---
> G solv                     -32.3629                0.7251
0.5127
> TOTAL                      -40.8938                2.5240
1.7848
129c129
< EPB                         60.5134                1.4402
1.0184
---
> EPB                         60.6541                1.2377
0.8752
132,133c132,133
< DELTA G solv                55.6968                1.4468
1.0231
<  DELTA G binding =        -39.1533     +/-      1.8331
1.2962
---
> DELTA G solv                55.8376                1.2454
0.8806
>  DELTA G binding =       -39.0126     +/-      2.0356
1.4394
143c143
< EPB                      -3117.8743               24.7574
17.5061
---
> EPB                      -3117.8429               24.7544
17.5040
146,147c146,147
< G solv                   -3050.4486               24.7620
17.5093
< TOTAL                   -22126.5624               20.9106
14.7861
---
> G solv                   -3050.4172               24.7590
17.5072
> TOTAL                   -22126.5310               20.9136
14.7882
153c153
< EPB                      -3142.7956               22.7384
16.0785
---
> EPB                      -3142.7532               22.7234
16.0679
156,157c156,157
< G solv                   -3073.8330               22.7411
16.0804
< TOTAL                   -22046.9596               21.4998
15.2027
---
> G solv                   -3073.7906               22.7261
16.0698
> TOTAL                   -22046.9172               21.5149
15.2133
163c163
< EPB                        -35.6427                0.7251
0.5128
---
> EPB                        -35.6425                0.7250
0.5127
166,167c166,167
< G solv                     -32.3630                0.7252
0.5128
< TOTAL                      -40.8940                2.5242
1.7849
---
> G solv                     -32.3629                0.7251
0.5127
> TOTAL                      -40.8938                2.5240
1.7848
173c173
< EPB                         60.5639                1.2938
0.9148
---
> EPB                         60.5529                1.3060
0.9235
176,177c176,177
< DELTA G solv                55.7474                1.3011
0.9200
<  DELTA G binding =        -38.7089     +/-      1.9350
1.3683
---
> DELTA G solv                55.7364                1.3133
0.9286
>  DELTA G binding =        -38.7200     +/-      1.9228
1.3596
180c180
< RESULT OF ALANINE SCANNING: (D231A MUTANT:) DELTA DELTA G binding =
0.4443  +/-    2.6654
---
> RESULT OF ALANINE SCANNING: (D231A MUTANT:) DELTA DELTA G binding =
0.2926  +/-    2.8001
Do you think it safe for running?
With my best regard
Co
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>wrote:
> These are expected.  The end of the log of AT15_Amber11.py says this:
>
> NOTE: Because PBSA has changed since Amber 11 was released, some
> tests are known to fail and others are known to quit in error. These
> can be safely ignored.
>
> Tests that error: Tests in $AMBERHOME/test/sander_pbsa_frc
>   Run.argasp.min    Run.dadt.min      Run.dgdc.min
>   Run.lysasp.min    Run.polyALA.min   Run.polyAT.min
>   Run.argasp.min    Run.dadt.min      Run.dgdc.min
>   Run.lysasp.min    Run.polyALA.min   Run.polyAT.min
>   Run.argasp.min    Run.dadt.min      Run.dgdc.min
>   Run.lysasp.min    Run.polyALA.min   Run.polyAT.min
>
> Tests that produce possible FAILUREs:
>   cd sander_pbsa_ipb2   && ./Run.110D.min
>   cd sander_pbsa_lpb    && ./Run.lsolver.min (only some of them fail here)
>   cd sander_pbsa_tsr    && ./Run.tsrb.min
>   cd sander_pbsa_decres && ./Run.pbsa_decres
>   mm_pbsa.pl tests 02, 03, and 05
>
> HTH,
> Jason
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:16 AM, co nguyentruong <nguoithamdo.gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Sorry all, i forgot to attach logs file.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:14 PM, co nguyentruong <nguoithamdo.gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Dear
> > >
> > >  we set up serial and parallel of two Amber11 versions in rock 5.4 and
> > > compiler is gcc-4-4 and use mpich for parallel installation . The first
> > one
> > > is version of Amber 11 and AmberTool 1.4 and second one is Amber11 and
> > > AmberTool 1.5. Their names are Amber1114 and Amber11_1.5 respectively.
> > > However, while almost of tests of Amber1114 got one possible failure,
> > > Amber11_1.5 got more possible failures. I attached log file of their
> test
> > > on our cluster. And some users bothered that my amber set up is not
> > > reliable. Should we use these installation for running ?
> > >
> > > Thank you very much
> > >
> > > Nguyen Truong Co
> > >
> > > Institute for Computational Science and Technology
> > >
> > > Ho Chi Minh City Viet Nam
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AMBER mailing list
> > AMBER.ambermd.org
> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Candidate
> 352-392-4032
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Nov 24 2011 - 05:00:05 PST
Custom Search