Re: [AMBER] About SMD simulation restart file

From: Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:50:08 -0400

On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Bill Ross <ross.cgl.ucsf.edu> wrote:

> > >
> > > Beyond that, both mdcrd and mdvel have less precision than restrt,
> > > so even if you had both and combined them to produce a restrt, it
> > > wouldn't be as good as a normal restrt, and some equilibration
> > > could be desireable.
> > >
> >
> > Actually if they use NetCDF (which everybody should be, and the only
> option
> > for combining mdvel/mdcrd), then they have more precision than a restart
> > (full single precision, unformatted), so this would be unnecessary.
>
> Why not use NetCDF for restrt?
>

We will be shortly. The ability is in the development branches. It was
only recently implemented (all credit to Dan Roe there).


> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Candidate
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Oct 14 2011 - 22:00:02 PDT
Custom Search