Re: [AMBER] please help me

From: Brian Radak <radak004.umn.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:47:31 -0400

Pancham,

I do not often (never in fact) use GB, but I think your cutoff should be
very large (perhaps 999.0) when using ntb = 0.

You might also try using a larger value for ncyc. I believe it is somewhat
common (at least for me) to see some instabilities after a large number of
conjugate gradient steps. I frequently set ncyc = maxcyc and run only
steepest descent minimization.

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong/under experienced on either
account.

Regards,
Brian

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:04 AM, pancham lal gupta <
panchamlalgupta.gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi........
> i was doing energy minimization heme bounded cytochrome P-450,
> with this minimization script
>
> Initial minimization of protein
> &cntrl
> imin=1,
> maxcyc=1000,
> ncyc=100,
> ntb=0,
> igb=1,
> cut=12,
> /
> after ligand replacement i have got many structure with diffrent
> orientations......
> when i have done energy minimization of them some structure is giving NaN
> and some structure is giving energy value after running to all
> step.........
>
> what should i do to get energy value for all the structure ? because
> finally
> i have to compare them
> plz help me...........
>
>
>
> pancham
> IIT DELHI
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



-- 
================================ Current Address =======================
 Brian Radak                                             :     BioMaPS
Institute for Quantitative Biology
 PhD candidate - York Research Group       :     Rutgers, The State
University of New Jersey
 University of Minnesota - Twin Cities         :     Wright-Rieman Hall 101
 Graduate Program in Chemical Physics     :     610 Taylor Road,
 Department of Chemistry                          :     Piscataway, NJ
08854-8066
 radak004.umn.edu                                 :
radakb.biomaps.rutgers.edu
====================================================================
Sorry for the multiple e-mail addresses, just use the institute appropriate
address.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Oct 12 2011 - 07:00:04 PDT
Custom Search