[AMBER] ntf parameters in energy minimization

From: Qin Zhang <zqyork.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 12:24:51 -0500

Dear All Amber users;
  I would like to take an energy minimization only based on GB energy,
even though the energy model is not right. So I select ntf=8.
But it still reports VDWAALS and EEL energy.

   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
      1 -1.2636E+04 4.6321E+00 4.2128E+01 NH2 1969

 BOND = 0.0000 ANGLE = 0.0000 DIHED =
0.0000
 VDWAALS = -1154.8397 EEL = -8971.0206 EGB =
-2510.0640
 1-4 VDW = 0.0000 1-4 EEL = 0.0000 RESTRAINT =
0.0000

when I tried ntf=7. The results are exactly the same. When I check the code
force.f in /src/sander, there seems no ntf<8 choice. Could you please point
to me whether I can only select GB force for energy minimization? Or you
can
paste a right input file?
My input is as follows.

GB energy minimization
&cntrl imin=1, maxcyc=10
cut=300.0, igb=1, saltcon=0, gbsa=0, extdiel=80.0, intdiel=1.0
ntpr=1, ntx=1, ntb=0, ntf=8
&end
&end

Thank you very much.

zqyork
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Aug 29 2011 - 10:30:02 PDT
Custom Search