> Just to be sure, I didn't recompile everything, just the cuda part.
> That means I didn't do the first two lines below (tar xzvj
> Amber11.tar.bz2; tar xzvj AmberTools-1.5.tar.bz2). This should be
> alright?
In principal yes. At least if it worked for you and the cuda test cases pass
you should be good. The degrees of freedom are pretty high though so I can't
confirm that applying such a large patch to an existing tree will always
work but it is at least designed to.
I assume you did 'make clean' in $AMBERHOME/src and
$AMBERHOME/AmberTools/src before compiling pmemd.cuda afresh?
All the best
Ross
/\
\/
|\oss Walker
---------------------------------------------------------
| Assistant Research Professor |
| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
| Adjunct Assistant Professor |
| Dept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry |
| University of California San Diego |
| NVIDIA Fellow |
|
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk |
http://www.wmd-lab.org/ |
| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
---------------------------------------------------------
Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Aug 19 2011 - 11:30:04 PDT
