Re: [AMBER] No data for 0+2 PB PB 0 problem in Amber10 mm_pbsa

From: <sribone.fcq.unc.edu.ar>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:12:56 -0300

I already have the ambertools1.5, are you suggesting the mmpbsa.py to
calculate the binding energy??
Thank you very much for your answer.
Sergio.

> I suggest that you download the latest ambertool (1.5). It's free and
> much better supported ...
>
> All the best,
> Ray
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 8:04 AM, <sribone.fcq.unc.edu.ar> wrote:
>> Dear all, Im writing because I've been trying to solve a problem with
>> the mm_pbsa for months but I can not do it. When I calculate the
>> binding energy for a ligand-enzime complex by mm_pbsa in amber10 using
>> the following input:
>>
>> PREFIX                tr103-sr25
>> PATH                  ./
>> #
>> COMPLEX               1
>> RECEPTOR              1
>> LIGAND                1
>> #
>> COMPT                 complejo.prmtop
>> RECPT                 receptor.prmtop
>> LIGPT                 ligando.prmtop
>> #
>> GC                    0
>> AS                    0
>> DC                    0
>> #
>> MM                    1
>> GB                    1
>> PB                    1
>> MS                    1
>> #
>> NM                    0
>> PROC                  2
>> REFE                  0
>> INDI                  1.0
>> EXDI                  80.0
>> SCALE                 1
>> LINIT                 1000
>> PRBRAD                1.4
>> ISTRNG                0.0
>> RADIOPT               0
>> NPOPT                 1
>> CAVITY_SURFTEN        0.0072
>> CAVITY_OFFSET         0.00
>> #
>> SURFTEN               0.0072
>> SURFOFF               0.00
>>
>> DIELC                 1.0
>>
>> IGB                   2
>> GBSA                  1
>> SALTCON               0.00
>> EXTDIEL               80.0
>> INTDIEL               1.0
>> #
>> SURFTEN               0.0072
>> SURFOFF               0.00
>>
>> PROBE                 0.0
>>
>> I received the following problem:
>>
>> Use of uninitialized value in multiplication (*) at
>> /home/sergio/Programas/amber10/src/mm_pbsa/mm_pbsa_statistics.pm line
>> 1378.
>>     No data for 0+2 PB PB 0
>>
>> The output file gave me some warnings:
>>  Reading tr103-sr25_com.all.out
>>     WARNING: Missing PBNONPOL for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing ELRAELE for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing EPB for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     Reading tr103-sr25_rec.all.out
>>     Checking CALC
>>     WARNING: Missing PBNONPOL for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing ELRAELE for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing EPB for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     Reading tr103-sr25_lig.all.out
>>     Checking CALC
>>     WARNING: Missing PBNONPOL for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing PB for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing ELRAELE for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>     WARNING: Missing EPB for PB in 0 -> Taken from -1
>>
>> The energy output for ligand, receptor and complex are:
>> ligand
>> MM
>> GB
>> PB
>> MS
>> 1
>>  BOND    =        6.4620  ANGLE   =        9.0237  DIHED      =    
>>   15.3520
>>  VDWAALS =       -4.9297  EEL     =        0.0000  EGB        =    
>>    0.0000
>>  1-4 VDW =       16.1895  1-4 EEL =        0.0000  RESTRAINT  =    
>>    0.0000
>> surface area =    594.734
>> ECAVITY =    594.734
>> EDISPER = 0.0000
>>
>> receptor
>> MM
>> GB
>> PB
>> MS
>> 1
>>  BOND    =     3076.6042  ANGLE   =     8300.7106  DIHED      =    
>> 9726.1992
>>  VDWAALS =    -7614.1238  EEL     =   -73971.1573  EGB        =  
>> -12444.1021
>>  1-4 VDW =     3708.5404  1-4 EEL =    47222.5091  RESTRAINT  =    
>>    0.0000
>> corrected reaction field energy:   -20517.454143
>> surface area =  52994.258
>> ECAVITY =  52994.258
>> EDISPER = 0.0000
>>
>> complex
>> MM
>> GB
>> PB
>> MS
>> 1
>>  BOND    =     3083.0662  ANGLE   =     8309.7344  DIHED      =    
>> 9741.5536
>>  VDWAALS =    -7655.2357  EEL     =   -73971.1573  EGB        =  
>> -12436.3100
>>  1-4 VDW =     3724.7299  1-4 EEL =    47222.5091  RESTRAINT  =    
>>    0.0000
>> corrected reaction field energy:   -20505.425856
>> surface area =  52811.495
>> ECAVITY =  52811.495
>> EDISPER = 0.0000
>>
>> I patched the bugfixes for amber. I've been running mm_pbsa for others
>> very similar ligands, but I never had this problem before.
>> I appreciate any kind of help or explanation about this problem.
>> Thank you very much for your time.
>>
>> Sergio Ribone.
>>
>>
>> Dept Pharmacy, Science Chemistry Phaculty
>> National University of Córdoba
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 16 2011 - 05:30:04 PDT
Custom Search