Re: [AMBER] sander11

From: Adrian Roitberg <roitberg.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:56:23 +0200

should be ok in principle...
The force fields available when Amber 8 was out were not really that
great, so even if you continue running with Amber 11, you would be using
an old force field.

Adrian


On 7/4/11 12:54 PM, haris p wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any major difference between sander8 and sander11. any problem in
> comparing two works one in sander8 and the other sander11.
> Or any problem if a work run for 20 ns under sander8 to be continued with
> sander11.
>
> Thanking you for the reply
>
> Haris
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

-- 
                            Dr. Adrian E. Roitberg
                              Full Professor
                Quantum Theory Project, Department of Chemistry
                            University of Florida
on Sabbatical in Barcelona until August 2011.
Email roitberg.ufl.edu
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Jul 04 2011 - 04:00:04 PDT
Custom Search