Hi Jason,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Is it a problem that ptraj was not built with NetCDF support?
> >
>
> Only if you want to process NetCDF trajectories. Is there a reason you
> compiled without NetCDF support? (You have to go out of your way to omit
> NetCDF support).
That's actually the part that was confusing me, because as far as I could
tell, I did compile AmberTools with NetCDF support, but for some reason,
ptraj doesn't accept it.
Configuring NetCDF; (may be time-consuming)
NetCDF configure succeeded.
As far as I know, my trajectories are formatted, because I don't set the
ioutfm variable. Would the lack of NetCDF support still be a problem in this
case?
Thank you, and sorry for repetitious questions.
Kamali Sripathi
HTH,
> Jason
>
> --
> Jason M. Swails
> Quantum Theory Project,
> University of Florida
> Ph.D. Candidate
> 352-392-4032
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>
--
Kamali Sripathi
Graduate Student, Medicinal Chemistry
Walter Laboratory
930 North University
Ann Arbor, MI, 48109
ksripath.umich.edu
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sun May 08 2011 - 07:00:03 PDT
