Re: [AMBER] AmberTools 1.4 PGI failed antechamber/sustiva test

From: Shan-ho Tsai <tsai.hal.physast.uga.edu>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:41:25 -0400 (EDT)

Dear Dr. Case,
Thank you so much for your response. Of course, you are
absolutely right, I always forget that PGI 7.2 is very
old by now. After recompiling with the recent PGI 11.3
the antechamber/sustiva test ran fine.

I really appreciate your response.
Thanks again,
Shan-Ho

-----------------------------
Shan-Ho Tsai
University of Georgia, Athens GA

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, dacase.rci.rutgers.edu wrote:

>>
>> Last year I installed AmberTools 1.4 (with bugfixes 1 to 8)
>> with Portland Group compilers (PGI v. 7.2.3)
>
> I don't have a solution, but rather a question: why do you want to do this?
> More explicitly: this is a *very* old version of PGI, and the standard GNU
> compilers should be fine. Someone on the list may have PGI version 7
> around, but I suspect that the odds are long.
>
> ...dac
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Fri Apr 29 2011 - 14:00:04 PDT
Custom Search