Re: [AMBER] comparision of gromacs and amber

From: zjxu <zjxu.mail.shcnc.ac.cn>
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:49:49 +0800

Dear atila,
In my experience, gromacs is faster, but amber has a more reasonable
force field.

atila petrosian wrote:
> Dear amber users
> I'm beginner in amber. If I want to do 2 simulations with same condition by
> amber and gromacs,
> Which of these two programs is faster?
>
> I want to know differences between amber and gromacs.
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Dec 11 2010 - 06:00:02 PST
Custom Search