Re: [AMBER] energy calculation error after extracting peptide from the explicit water simulation

From: Daniel Roe <daniel.r.roe.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:29:42 -0500

Hi,

Do you have ptraj/AmberTools patched up to the latest bugfix?
http://ambermd.org/bugfixesat.html

-Dan

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Bongkeun Kim <bkim.chem.ucsb.edu> wrote:
> I made a pdb file which has peptide only from the last rst file.
> And I used it  to the leap to generate prmtop and inpcrd files.
>
> In ptraj, my command is
> ptraj 2hb_xw.prmtop <extw.traj
> And in the extw.traj
> ----------
> trajin 2hb2_equil_wat4.mdcrd.gz 1 10000
> trajout 2hb2_equil_x_wat.mdcrd nobox
> --------------
>
> I used VMD to see the coordinates but it showed only crashed structure.
> Thank you for it.
> Bongkeun Kim
>
>
> Quoting Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>:
>
>> Try visualizing the trajectory with your favorite program (like VMD or
>> something) and see if you can see any obvious clashes.
>>
>> Also, did you specify "nobox" in your trajout statement when using ptraj?
>>
>> Good luck!
>> Jason
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Bongkeun Kim <bkim.chem.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I used igb=5 and igb=6 both, but these gave me too large number and
>>> NaN error on output.
>>> --------------------------------
>>>    NSTEP       ENERGY          RMS            GMAX         NAME    NUMBER
>>>        1       1.7889E+21     1.5519E+22     4.7343E+23     CD        307
>>>
>>>  BOND    =  6254035.9830  ANGLE   =    72443.8361  DIHED      =
>>> 1478.1915
>>>  VDWAALS = *************  EEL     =    -6022.1977  EGB        =
>>>  0.0000
>>>  1-4 VDW =  9715179.9302  1-4 EEL =      836.5689  RESTRAINT  =
>>>  0.0000
>>> -bash-3.2$ tail 2hb2_equil_x_wat.out
>>>                     FINAL RESULTS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    NSTEP       ENERGY          RMS            GMAX         NAME    NUMBER
>>>        1              NaN            NaN     1.1769E+06     CG        145
>>>
>>>  BOND    = *************  ANGLE   =    69232.1399  DIHED      =
>>> 1514.8657
>>>  VDWAALS =           NaN  EEL     =     +Infinity  EGB        =
>>>  0.0000
>>>  1-4 VDW =       -0.0007  1-4 EEL =      104.8996  RESTRAINT  =
>>>  0.0000
>>> -bash-3.2$ tail 2hb2_equil_x_wat.out
>>>                     FINAL RESULTS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>    NSTEP       ENERGY          RMS            GMAX         NAME    NUMBER
>>>        1       1.2140E+08     8.3418E+05     1.1472E+07     OE2       364
>>>
>>>  BOND    = *************  ANGLE   =    65089.4218  DIHED      =
>>> 1452.7606
>>>  VDWAALS =  5545981.4707  EEL     =    -1282.8808  EGB        =
>>>  0.0000
>>>  1-4 VDW =   533470.1871  1-4 EEL =      891.5496  RESTRAINT  =
>>>  0.0000
>>> --------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> I guess it looks like there are some bugs when ptraj extracted coordinates.
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting Jason Swails <jason.swails.gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> > It sounds like it's still trying to use the box information, which it
>>> really
>>> > shouldn't if you've stripped the waters.  Do you want to run in some kind
>>> of
>>> > GB or PB implicit solvent, or just vacuum (gas phase) energies?
>>> >
>>> > Try setting the igb variable to the GB model you want to use (or set it
>>> to 6
>>> > if you want vacuum).  Does this fix your problem?
>>> >
>>> > Good luck,
>>> > Jason
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Bongkeun Kim <bkim.chem.ucsb.edu> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hello,
>>> >>
>>> >> I extracted peptide only mdcrd from the explicit water simulation with
>>> >> the peptide only prmtop file.
>>> >> And I tried to calculate EPTOT for the peptide with the following input.
>>> >> =================================
>>> >> extract energy
>>> >>  &cntrl
>>> >>   imin   = 5,
>>> >>   maxcyc = 1,
>>> >>   ntpr=1, ntwx=1,
>>> >>   ntb=0, cut=999
>>> >>  /
>>> >> =================================
>>> >>
>>> >> Error occurs after few steps of calculations like:
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------
>>> >>    NSTEP       ENERGY          RMS            GMAX         NAME
>>>  NUMBER
>>> >>       1       1.3554E+02     1.8784E+01     8.2938E+01     CG         85
>>> >>
>>> >>  BOND    =      130.6848  ANGLE   =      379.7738  DIHED      =
>>> >>  352.5286
>>> >>  VDWAALS =     -124.5685  EEL     =    -2520.8371  HBOND      =
>>> >>  0.0000
>>> >>  1-4 VDW =      132.3825  1-4 EEL =     1785.5740  RESTRAINT  =
>>> >>  0.0000
>>> >> minimization completed, ENE= 0.13553800E+03 RMS= 0.187837E+02
>>> >> minimizing coord set #     2
>>> >>  Frac coord min, max:   0.168166141059582        1.09509660191633
>>> >>  The system has extended beyond
>>> >>      the extent of the virtual box.
>>> >>  Restarting sander will recalculate
>>> >>     a new virtual box with 30 Angstroms
>>> >>     extra on each side, if there is a
>>> >>     restart file for this configuration.
>>> >>  SANDER BOMB in subroutine Routine: map_coords (ew_force.f)
>>> >>  Atom out of bounds. If a restart has been written,
>>> >>  restarting should resolve the error
>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> I checked mdcrd file and found too large number of coordinates with
>>> >> less precision.
>>> >> ---------------------------------------
>>> >>    1.000   2.000   0.000   3.000   9.000   3.000   4.000   8.000
>>> >> 9.000   1.000
>>> >>    1.000   8.000   3.000   5.000   3.000   9.000   5.000   1.000
>>> >> 0.000   4.000
>>> >>    5.000   3.000   2.000   9.000   3.000   1.000   3.000   5.000
>>> >> 2.000   7.000
>>> >>    6.000   6.000   6.000   2.000   8.000   2.000   8.000   0.000
>>> >> 7.000   3.000
>>> >>    0.000   3.000   8.000   8.000   2.000   7.000   4.000   5.000
>>> >> 6.000   2.000
>>> >>    0.000   0.000   2.000   4.000   2.000   6.000   5.000   0.000
>>> >> 3.000   4.000
>>> >>    9.000   3.000   6.000   4.000   1.000   4.000   5.000   0.000
>>> >> 1.000   6.000
>>> >>    2.000   7.000   8.000   5.000   4.000   3.000   6.000   1.000
>>> >> 1.000   9.000
>>> >>    6.000   3.000   9.000   6.000   1.000   5.000   1.000   8.000
>>> >> 0.000   8.000
>>> >>    7.000   8.000   3.000   5.000   7.000   8.000   6.000   7.000
>>> >> 8.000   7.000
>>> >>    7.000   1.000   4.000   7.000   9.000   1.000   0.000   8.000
>>> >> 9.000   0.000
>>> >>    7.000   4.000   3.000   2.000   4.000   2.000   8.000   1.000
>>> >> 7.000   9.000
>>> >>    5.000   8.000   0.000   0.000   6.000   9.000   1.000   9.000
>>> >> 1.000   9.000
>>> >>    7.000   4.000   8.000   2.000   1.000   1.000   2.000   4.000
>>> >> 4.000   0.000
>>> >>    0.000   6.000   6.000   8.000   6.000   6.000   9.000   4.000
>>> >> 1.000   3.000
>>> >>    8.000   8.000   0.000   6.000   5.000   1.000   1.000   0.000
>>> >> 8.000   9.000
>>> >>    1.000   2.000   8.000   7.000   7.000   7.000   1.000   5.000
>>> >> 0.000   8.000
>>> >>    5.000   2.000   3.000   7.000   0.000   3.000   2.000   7.000
>>> >> 3.000   9.000
>>> >>    7.000   8.000   9.000   0.000   5.000   1.000   7.000   2.000
>>> >> 9.000   1.000
>>> >>    9.000   7.000   0.000   2.000   1.000   2.000   1.000   9.000
>>> >>   41.088   9.420  62.665  41.721   9.148  61.455  41.567  10.044
>>> >> 35.604  26.216
>>> >>   21.505  34.680  26.278  21.261  35.621  26.433  22.437  14.278
>>> >> 11.771  31.180
>>> >>   13.541  12.366  31.319  14.961  12.321  30.796  16.130  29.593
>>> >> 25.338  15.722
>>> >>   30.307  25.829  15.438  29.277  24.757  16.856  41.297   2.102
>>> >> 17.512  40.872
>>> >>    2.655  16.070  41.333   2.647  36.490   3.145   5.092  36.652
>>> >> 4.079   5.219
>>> >>   37.363   2.759   5.015   7.146   2.097   0.247   7.539   1.234
>>> >> 0.117   7.889
>>> >>    2.701   0.249  48.336  17.814   3.189  48.102  16.902   3.019
>>> >> 49.070  17.762
>>> >>    3.801  35.401  29.453  25.979  34.841  30.226  25.920  36.101
>>> >> 29.615  25.346
>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm using AMBER 11 GPU with the recent bugfix 12.
>>> >> If you have any idea, please let me know.
>>> >> Thank you.
>>> >> Bongkeun Kim
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> AMBER mailing list
>>> >> AMBER.ambermd.org
>>> >> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Jason M. Swails
>>> > Quantum Theory Project,
>>> > University of Florida
>>> > Ph.D. Graduate Student
>>> > 352-392-4032
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > AMBER mailing list
>>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AMBER mailing list
>>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jason M. Swails
>> Quantum Theory Project,
>> University of Florida
>> Ph.D. Graduate Student
>> 352-392-4032
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Dec 02 2010 - 12:00:03 PST
Custom Search