We really must know what amber version you are using. The neb differs vastly
for a case like yours. Amber11 allows explicit solvent. Your system is
likely to be very inefficient in GB, not to me.tion accuracy issues. Amber11
neb should be reasonable. Of course you will need careful validation.
On Oct 7, 2010 8:43 PM, "patrick wintrode" <pat_wde2.yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm studying a conformational change in a large protein. Using implicit
solvent, the system size is ~5,000 atoms (45 kD protein). Crystal structures
are available for both the start and end states. The conformational change
is quite large: one part of the protein moves nearly 40 angstroms, and most
of the structure moves somewhat in response, so it's not clear that forces
can be applied to only part of the system.
I'm working through the NEB tutorial now, but before I invest too much time,
I want to check that I'm not wildly overestimating the size of the systems
that the NEB method can realistically handle. I have access to a reasonably
large computing cluster with ~1,200 processors.
Based on the above, does this sound like a feasible application of NEB?
Thanks.
Patrick L. Wintrode
Department of Physiology & Biophysics
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Oct 07 2010 - 18:00:03 PDT
