Hello,
If it was a missing libraries issue, you'd get an error that said so, I
believe. A segfault is indicative of a memory violation, so it's unlikely
to be that (though of course someone may prove me wrong). How many frames
are you trying to calculate a distance for? Can you reduce the number of
frames, to say 1 or 2, and see if you still get the segfault?
(I don't remember how the thread started, so I'm sorry if this is
redundant/useless).
Good luck!
Jason
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Seibold, Stephen <Seibold79.stmary.edu>wrote:
>
> Hi AMBER
> I re-compiled AmberToolset with gcc 4.1.0 ( I was using 4.4.0) and ran all
> the tests. It passed them all. However, again, when I try to run ptraj using
> distances, I get "Segmentation fault". Again, rdparm reads the trajectory
> files without any problem.
>
> I was worried about memory and so, I made sure I was set at "unlimited" on
> my memory stack...I don't know it this was useless or not, but I tried.
>
> Could it be that my AmberTools is pointing to the wrong libraries??? Could
> someone please tell me how to check this??
>
>
> Thanks for your help. Responses have been very consistent with AMBER and I
> am truly grateful.
>
> Cheers, Steve
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
--
Jason M. Swails
Quantum Theory Project,
University of Florida
Ph.D. Graduate Student
352-392-4032
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Oct 02 2010 - 16:00:04 PDT
