Re: [AMBER] question on improper dihedrals

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:55:57 -0400

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010, Jason Swails wrote:
>
> I've been combing through the prmtop and relevant potential parameters and
> I've run across something that doesn't quite make sense to me. The improper
> dihedral parameters are described in the amber format specification as:
>
> IPT , JPT , KPT , LPT , IDIVF , PK , PHASE , PN

Please heed the note for card 7 at http://ambermd.org/formats.html#parm.dat:

The input is the same as in for the dihedrals except that
the torsional barrier height is NOT divided by the factor idivf.

So, idivf is indeed a placeholder, if present.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Aug 24 2010 - 13:00:05 PDT
Custom Search