Re: [AMBER] Adding lambda points less than 0.1 and greater than 0.9 in TI calculations

From: g t <sketchfoot.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:58:23 +0100

Thanks for the information Thomas. I'm looking into it now. :)

On 16 August 2010 20:13, <steinbrt.rci.rutgers.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> many things can go potentially wrong here. Try to understand better why
> your system might blow up, e.g. visualize the trajectory, check which
> atoms behave eratically, check if you can run the unperturbed systems at
> l=0 and 1...
>
> > vlimit exceeded for step 11; vmax = 488.1186
> > vlimit exceeded for step 12; vmax = 348.7365
> > vlimit exceeded for step 13; vmax = 476.1181
> > vlimit exceeded for step 14; vmax = 1107.8662
> > vlimit exceeded for step 15; vmax = 1210.8087
> > vlimit exceeded for step 16; vmax = 1076.5600
> > vlimit exceeded for step 17; vmax = 486.9208
> > vlimit exceeded for step 18; vmax = 183.4240
> > vlimit exceeded for step 19; vmax = 318.7466
> > SANDER BOMB in subroutine nonbond_list
> > volume of ucell too big, too many subcells
> > list grid memory needs to be reallocated, restart sander
> > ################################################################
>
> Sounds like your system 'exploded'. Visualize which atom started the
> disturbance.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
> Dr. Thomas Steinbrecher
> BioMaps Institute
> Rutgers University
> 610 Taylor Rd.
> Piscataway, NJ 08854
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Aug 19 2010 - 09:00:07 PDT
Custom Search