Re: [AMBER] Workaround for gfortran-4.1.2?

From: Marc Moreau <jebnor.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:39:11 -0600

In my searching earlier, there was a bug for it, but alas I couldn't
get in the bugzilla, and now I can't find the reference. A really low
bug id ( two digits ) if that helps any.

-- Marc

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:31 PM, case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Marc Moreau wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to compile against gcc-4.1.2 which includes the buggy
>> gfortran-4.1.2.
>>
>> I'm trying to compile with -O2 instead of the default -O3. Does anyone
>> know of any other things to try, or specific compiler flags that allow
>> a work-around of the buggy section in fortran?
>
> In addition to what Mark Williamson suggested, you might consider just living
> with the defects of 4.1.2.  As far as I remember (others can chime in here),
> only the ABMD stuff in sander is broken.  If that is true, and you don't plan
> to use that option, you might be able to live with the older compiler.
>
> If there are other problems with 4.1.2, let me(us) know -- we should probably
> set up a web page listing these.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jul 20 2010 - 19:00:04 PDT
Custom Search