Re: [AMBER] loadmol2 Segmentation fault

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:18:51 -0400

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010, FyD wrote:
>
> - Why the three "F" do not have the same charge value ? My feeling is
> that these three F are chemically equivalent, so their charge value
> should be equivalenced.
>
> - Why the two methylene groups of the cyclopropane group are not
> chemically equivalent ? once again, my understanding is that the
> corresponding charge values should be equivalent.

These are AM1-BCC charges; with the algorithm in antechamber equivalent atoms
do not necessarily have the same charges.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Apr 13 2010 - 05:30:04 PDT
Custom Search