[AMBER] Cyclic compounds

From: John S <s.john634.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 23:50:35 -0500

Dear Amber Users ,

While carrying out energy minimization using non periodic boundary
conditions using igb=1 .
Even after going through steepest descent minimization , my system shows a
high energy .Is it normal to get this in cyclic compounds .

 NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
   1800 6.8299E+01 3.0163E-03 1.7630E-02 C2 53

 BOND = 3.8707 ANGLE = 44.7856 DIHED =
8.7678
 VDWAALS = -1.7451 EEL = 0.5667 EGB =
-1.7387
 1-4 VDW = 12.2132 1-4 EEL = 1.5783 RESTRAINT =
0.0000


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
   1900 6.8299E+01 2.4809E-03 1.1919E-02 C2 53

 BOND = 3.8704 ANGLE = 44.7861 DIHED =
8.7674
 VDWAALS = -1.7450 EEL = 0.5667 EGB =
-1.7387
 1-4 VDW = 12.2132 1-4 EEL = 1.5783 RESTRAINT =
0.0000


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
   2000 6.8299E+01 1.5407E-03 6.8580E-03 C2 28

 BOND = 3.8706 ANGLE = 44.7863 DIHED =
8.7669
 VDWAALS = -1.7449 EEL = 0.5667 EGB =
-1.7387
 1-4 VDW = 12.2132 1-4 EEL = 1.5783 RESTRAINT =
0.0000


   NSTEP ENERGY RMS GMAX NAME NUMBER
   2100 6.8298E+01 1.0520E-03 3.1501E-03 H16 26

 BOND = 3.8707 ANGLE = 44.7866 DIHED =
8.7665
 VDWAALS = -1.7448 EEL = 0.5667 EGB =
-1.7387
 1-4 VDW = 12.2132 1-4 EEL = 1.5783 RESTRAINT =
0.0000


Your suggestions are highly appreciated .

Thanks
John.
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Mar 01 2010 - 21:00:03 PST
Custom Search