Re: [AMBER] Question about transition from AMBER6 to AMBER9

From: case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:06:58 -0500

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010, 坂庭 大輔 wrote:

> However, I cannot access to the force field of Amber9 in the server to
> rebuild new topology files.

Then I am afraid you will have to continue using Amber6 for your simulations.
As I said earlier, GB simulations now require the "new" (Amber7 and later)
format for prmtop files.

....dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Sat Feb 27 2010 - 08:30:02 PST
Custom Search