So I assume that the "1.1" message was just a leftover from the previous
version of the code that didn't get corrected...
But since this version still can't read the PSF file that I attached in
the last post, could someone in the development team take a look at it?
Thanks in advance
Sasha
case wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009, Sasha Buzko wrote:
>
>> A side question: I assume that the downloadable AmberTools release is in
>> fact 1.2, since there is no mention of it anywhere in the content
>> (docs/changelog refer to 1.0, installation ends with a reference to
>> 1.1). Is this a case of documentation that didn't get updated or
>> (hopefully, not) the incorrect version packaged for download?
>>
>
> The final message that says "1.1" should indeed say "1.2". You have the
> correct file.
>
> ...dac
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 20:34:43 PDT
