On Wed, Aug 05, 2009, Sasha Buzko wrote:
>
> A side question: I assume that the downloadable AmberTools release is in
> fact 1.2, since there is no mention of it anywhere in the content
> (docs/changelog refer to 1.0, installation ends with a reference to
> 1.1). Is this a case of documentation that didn't get updated or
> (hopefully, not) the incorrect version packaged for download?
The final message that says "1.1" should indeed say "1.2". You have the
correct file.
...dac
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Aug 19 2009 - 20:34:06 PDT
