RE: [AMBER] default integration scheme in 7 vs. 10

From: Ross Walker <ross.rosswalker.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:29:12 +0100

Hi Paul,

No Leap frog is used in all cases. PMEMD should exactly replicate Sander
behavior.

All the best
Ross

> -----Original Message-----
> From: amber-bounces.ambermd.org [mailto:amber-bounces.ambermd.org] On
> Behalf Of Paul Brandt
> Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:49 PM
> To: amber.ambermd.org
> Subject: [AMBER] default integration scheme in 7 vs. 10
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I know this question is asked often, but I'd like to confirm what I've
> read
> in the amber mail archives. Which integration scheme is used by Sander
> in
> Amber 7 and by PMEMD in Amber 10?
>
>
>
> If I read correctly in the archive, in 7, leap frog integration was
> employed, and in Sander and PMEMD in 10, velocity Verlet is used. Is
> this
> right?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Jul 06 2009 - 12:31:14 PDT
Custom Search