Re: [AMBER] Specifying improper dihedrals

From: Ben Roberts <roberts.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:18:41 +0100

Hi Bill,

I wasn't talking about parm.dat or frcmod files, but rather the final
prmtop. As it happened, the improper dihedrals I added I couldn't
specify there anyway; they're the ones I emailed the list about the
other day which span residue boundaries in unconventional ways.

Sorry for any confusion.

Cheers,
Ben

On 17/6/2009, at 1:56 p.m., Bill Ross wrote:

>> my solution was to reverse the atom index order in the dihedral
>
> I believe that with impropers the 3rd atom needs to be the central
> one, at least in parm.dat/frcmod files. So I would maintain this
> convention.
>
> Bill


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Mon Jul 06 2009 - 09:56:42 PDT
Custom Search