[AMBER] Is the result of sander same as that of pmemd?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Catein Catherine <
askamber23.hotmail.com
>
Date
: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:04:38 +0100
Dear All,
Could you mind to let me know should we expect the results of sander same as that of pmemd?
Can we do the MD firstly by sander, and followed by pmemd?
Best regards,
Cat
_________________________________________________________________
Drag n’ drop—Get easy photo sharing with Windows Live™ Photos.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/photos.aspx
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on
Mon Jul 06 2009 - 08:51:10 PDT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
guardiani.fi.infn.it: "Re: [AMBER] glycopeptide Parametrization"
Previous message
:
Vikas Sharma: "[AMBER] MM PBSA ERROR"
In reply to
:
Cen Gao: "Re: [AMBER] GAFF atom type question"
Next in thread
:
Robert Duke: "Re: [AMBER] Is the result of sander same as that of pmemd?"
Maybe reply
:
Robert Duke: "Re: [AMBER] Is the result of sander same as that of pmemd?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
Custom Search