Any group of simulations using stochastic thermostats, including
Langevin, is subject to synchronization effects if using the same seed
for all simulations, and eventually you end up with all correlated
runs, which influences your statistics. Note that, in Amber10, you can
avoid that by just using 'ig=-1' in all cases. That will tell sander
to generate a new random seed every time, I believe based on clock
time.
Gustavo Seabra
Postdoctoral Associate
Quantum Theory Project - University of Florida
Gainesville - Florida - USA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q: Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
A: To prevent the sensible ones from going home.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Andrew Voronkov <drugdesign.yandex.ru> wrote:
> Only that I did several runs in this way...ok so I'll remake it.
>
> 03.06.09, 17:55, "Gustavo Seabra" <gustavo.seabra.gmail.com>:
>
>> Do you have any reason *not* tuo use a differend random seed for each run?
>> Gustavo Seabra
>> Postdoctoral Associate
>> Quantum Theory Project - University of Florida
>> Gainesville - Florida - USA
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Q: Why do mountain climbers rope themselves together?
>> A: To prevent the sensible ones from going home.
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Andrew Voronkov <drugdesign.yandex.ru> wrote:
>> > I want to make 30-50 nanosecond run of the protein with explicit waters. But I have limitations on our cluster for time of each job. Can I divide it in several (let's say 5-10 nanosecond runs) without random seed or I need to use random seed in each restart? (output rst -> input rst). Main question of the study is to look at stability of the structure and make average structure from stability parts of trajectpry.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Andrew Voronkov
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AMBER mailing list
>> > AMBER.ambermd.org
>> > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> AMBER mailing list
>> AMBER.ambermd.org
>> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Thu Jun 04 2009 - 01:14:46 PDT
