Re: [AMBER] Choice of force field

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:14:09 +0100

you need to tell us more- do you mean best for the ligand, or is it with a
protein, or some other molecule?
for proteins I suggest ff99SB< you can search the archives since there has
been lots of discussion about it in the past.

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:39 PM, manoj singh <mks.amber.gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Amber Users,
> I am relatively new to Amber and have some doubt.
>
> I am trying to do FEP calculations to study the effect of mutation on
> binding affinity of the ligand. I have parameterized the ligand using
> antechamber with GAFF. Which version of amber force field would be best
> choice for me. I am more inclined towards ff03 but I am not sure and
> therefore looking for some expert advise.
>
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> AMBER mailing list
> AMBER.ambermd.org
> http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Tue Jun 02 2009 - 01:08:23 PDT
Custom Search