Re: [AMBER] gaff and aromatic compounds

From: David A. Case <case.biomaps.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:07:29 +0100

On Tue, May 19, 2009, rebeca wrote:

> I have a doubt about the parametrization of aromatic systems with the Gaff
> force field.
> For example, in the case of naphthalene, after
>
> $AMBERHOME/exe/antechamber -i naphthalene.pdb -fi pdb -o naphthalene.mol2
> -fo mol2 -c bcc -s 2 &
>
> the naphthalene.mol2 bond section is this one:
>
> .<TRIPOS>BOND
> 1 1 2 ar
> 2 1 3 ar
> 3 1 4 2
> 4 2 5 ar
> 5 2 6 2
> 6 3 8 ar
> 7 3 17 1
> 8 4 9 ar
> 9 4 16 1
> 10 5 7 ar
> 11 5 15 1
> 12 6 10 ar
> 13 6 14 1
> 14 7 8 ar
> 15 7 13 1
> 16 8 12 1
> 17 9 10 ar
> 18 9 11 1
> 19 10 18 1

The bond type is not directly used by Amber or gaff. What you need to check
is what the atom types are for various atoms, and what the actual bond force
constants and equilibrium angles are.

(cc-ing to Junmei, in case he sees something to fix here.)

...dac


_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 17:30:23 PDT
Custom Search