[AMBER] scee term

From: Neha Gandhi <n.gandhiau.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:03:48 +0100

Hi List,

I was wondering if anybody has tried using scee=2.0 with mm-pbsa? What
if I use scee=2.0 with latest versions of amber forcefield for
negatively charged ligands?

With negative charged ligands, my experience says we get very negative
energies using mm-pbsa method, because the electrostatic term
dominates and the solvation term is smaller compared to the gas phase.
What parameter would be helpful in such a case?

I appreciate your advice.

-- 
Regards,
Neha Gandhi,
School of Biomedical Sciences,
Curtin University of Technology,
GPO Box U1987 Perth,
Western Australia 6845
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 16:36:11 PDT
Custom Search