Re: [AMBER] Right force fields

From: Vikas Sharma <vs_vikassharma.yahoo.co.in>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:14:04 +0100

Thank you.. Just wanted to know that if am using antechamber for the ligand do i need to do QM calculations using gaussian coz  i found one of the tutorials mrntioning use of gaussian for calculation of charges..or is it so thet when i face problems with antechamber then i should go for gaussian ________________________________ From: Patrick Schopf <schopf.patrick.googlemail.com> To: AMBER Mailing List <amber.ambermd.org> Sent: Friday, 17 April, 2009 6:18:14 PM Subject: Re: [AMBER] Right force fields Hi Vikas, I can't remember having seen a publication that actually shows that ff03 and gaff are 'compatible' in terms of charges. As long as this has not been published I would not use ff03. However, this is just an opinion, and not the final experts one. Patrick Vikas Sharma wrote: >    > Dear All, > I use xleap. > The force fields which I use are gaff & ff03.. >    I am working on MM PBSA. > > Am i Using the right combination of force fields? > > I just wanted to know that while running antechamber which charges(RESP or BCC) should i use with which force fields? > > Thanks > > > >      Connect with friends all over the world. Get Yahoo! India Messenger at http://in.messenger.yahoo.com/?wm=n/ > _______________________________________________ > AMBER mailing list > AMBER.ambermd.org > http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber > >  _______________________________________________ AMBER mailing list AMBER.ambermd.org http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to http://messenger.yahoo.com/invite/
_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 11:28:54 PDT
Custom Search