RE: [AMBER] Atom types

From: George Tzotzos <gtzotzos.mac.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:02:42 +0100

Hi Ross,

Many thanks. It did work as per your suggestion. However, I have one (I hope) remaining question.

I now have a ligand in mol2 that check OK in xleap. I also have the protein.pdb file which also check OK in xleap. The question is how do I treat the <complex.pdb>. Somehow, I need to append after the TER label the coordinates of the ligand as well as the atom types that were worked out from antechamber. The problem, as I see it, is that the ligand is in mol2.

Solution?

Many thanks in advance

George


 
On Monday, January 19, 2009, at 04:46PM, "Ross Walker" <ross.rosswalker.co.uk> wrote:
>Hi George,
>
>> I'm loading on xleap a protein/ligand complex obtained from a docking
>> simulation using AutoDock v.4.
>>
>> When I do a check in xleap I get the following fatal errors:
>>
>> WARNING: The unperturbed charge of the unit: -8.000000 is not zero.
>> FATAL: Atom .R<UNK 126>.A<C 1> does not have a type.
>> FATAL: Atom .R<UNK 126>.A<O 2> does not have a type.
>>
>> The ligand is a simple unsaturated aliphatic aldehyde.
>
>You need to provide parameters and charges for the aliphatic aldehyde since
>it is not part of the standard library (amino acids and dna / rna etc). The
>simplest way to do this is to use the GAFF force field and antechamber. The
>following tutorial gives an example of using this:
>http://ambermd.org/tutorials/basic/tutorial4/
>
>You will need to build a pdb file containing just your ligand with the
>hydrogens in place as well. You may also want to consider naming it
>something other than UNK (3 letters max) although in your case since you
>only have this one non-standard residue having it named UNK will not cause a
>problem.
>
>Good luck,
>Ross
>
>
>/\
>\/
>|\oss Walker
>
>| Assistant Research Professor |
>| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
>| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
>| http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | PGP Key available on request |
>
>Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
>be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>AMBER mailing list
>AMBER.ambermd.org
>http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
>
>

_______________________________________________
AMBER mailing list
AMBER.ambermd.org
http://lists.ambermd.org/mailman/listinfo/amber
Received on Wed Jan 21 2009 - 01:11:43 PST
Custom Search