Hi Jochen,
> However, the manual says (Amber9/10) that GB implicit solvent minimization
> using constraint atoms is currently not possible. On the other hand,
> DOCK6.1
> apparently allows the definition of frozen atoms upon GB minimization
> in the context of amber_score. Is there a workaround for doing this in
> native Amber?
This is a limitation of sander's gb implementation. NAB supports it which is
what I believe the Dock implementation is based on. I wrote a version of
egb.f for sander v9 a long time ago that fixes this limitation. A patch is
attached which you can apply to amber 9 with:
mv sander9_gb_belly.patch $AMBERHOME/src/sander
cd $AMBERHOME/src/sander
patch -p0 <sander9_gb_belly.patch
This only works against amber 9 (I haven't had a chance to do it for Amber
10). I also have only tested it again the released version (so it is
possible that some of the bugfixes could mess up the patch but you should
get a message about patching failed if that is the case).
Feel free to try this but please use it at your own risk, I haven't
extensively tested it to make sure it is strictly correct, I just 'think' it
is.
The alternative would be to do the minimization in NAB instead of sander.
Good luck,
Ross
/\
\/
|\oss Walker
| Assistant Research Professor |
| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
|
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | PGP Key available on request |
Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Fri Dec 05 2008 - 14:35:23 PST
