I found the following code in $AMBERHOME/src/etc/ambpdb.f :
561             if (atnam.eq.' H3 ') then
562                if( resnam .ne. 'THY' .and. resnam(1:2) .ne.  
'DT' .and.
563      .             resnam(1:2) .ne. 'RU' .and. resnam .ne. 'URA' )
564      .             atnam = '2H  '
565             end if
According to this code, this if-block enters '2H ' to 'atnam' (line :  
564) in spite of the expression "atnam .eq. 'H3 '" of the if statement  
(line : 561).
I think this line (564) should be
564      .             atnam = '3H  '
Please look into this.  > Developer team.
Kazuo.
> I posted yesterday about alleged problems of add-H with leap. However,
> the message included follow up with Amber components in DOCK. Probably
> the (reasonable) reason why I had no answer.
>
> Now I am restricting my problem to Amber10 and AmberTools1.2. I have
> repeated generation of full-atoms file with leap and ambpdb,
> confirming previous outcome.
>
> Starting noh file:
>
> TOM      1  N   LEU A   1
> ATOM      2  CA  LEU A   1
> ATOM      3  CB  LEU A   1
> ATOM      4  CG  LEU A   1
> ATOM      5  CD1 LEU A   1
> ATOM      6  CD2 LEU A   1
> ATOM      7  C   LEU A   1
> ATOM      8  O   LEU A   1
>
> Resulting pdb, created from prmtop/inpcrd:
>
> ATOM      1  N   LEU     1
> ATOM      2 1H   LEU     1
> ATOM      3 2H   LEU     1
> ATOM      4 2H   LEU     1
> ATOM      5  CA  LEU     1
> ATOM      6  HA  LEU     1
> ATOM      7  CB  LEU     1
> ATOM      8 2HB  LEU     1
> ATOM      9 3HB  LEU     1
> ATOM     10  CG  LEU     1
> ATOM     11  HG  LEU     1
> ATOM     12  CD1 LEU     1
> ATOM     13 1HD1 LEU     1
> ATOM     14 2HD1 LEU     1
> ATOM     15 3HD1 LEU     1
> ATOM     16  CD2 LEU     1
> ATOM     17 1HD2 LEU     1
> ATOM     18 2HD2 LEU     1
> ATOM     19 3HD2 LEU     1
>
> What I am asking here is if hydrogens have been added correctly to LEU
> as first residue, focusing the attention to hydrogen names for atoms
> 2-4. From Amber, I would have expected
>
> 2 H1
> 3 H2
> 4 H3
>
> however, I have no previous experience with LEU as first residue in
> Amber. I wonder whether the error is with these atom names. If not,
> the module in DOCK is unable to treat correctly leap-protonated LEU as
> first residue. In that case I'll ask to dock users.
>
> Must add that I am using AmberTools 1.2 for the first time. So far,
> with Amber 10 I had AmberTools 1.0.
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
>      to majordomo.scripps.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Mon Oct 20 2008 - 05:08:53 PDT