Re: AMBER: internal energy INT is not zero from MM_GBSA

From: sobereva <sobjubao.yahoo.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT)

Hi,
There may be some potential terms of
bond/angle/dihedral exist between ligand and
receptor.You should check it carefully before you
generate topology file in leap.

Lu Tian


--- flyanping <flyanping.hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> Dear Amber community:I used mm_gbsa to calculat
> binding free energies,however the final result
> showed:ELE -8.21 7.60VDW
> -20.20 2.07INT -4.72
> 1.09GAS -33.14 7.93GBSUR
> -3.08 0.16GB 10.08
> 5.45GBSOL 7.00 5.40GBELE
> 1.86 4.77GBTOT -26.14
> 5.06In the tutorial ,it's said the INT = internal
> energy arising from bond, angle and dihedral terms
> in the MM force field. (this term always amounts to
> zero in the single trajectory approach).Mine is not
> 0,what does INT=non zero mean? How it happened
> ?Anything wrong with my calcs?Could any body point
> me out how to modify my simulation to make INT close
> to 0.
> Thanks&regards,Yanping
>
_________________________________________________________________
> MSN 中文网,最新时尚生活资讯,白领聚集门户。
> http://cn.msn.com



      
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
      to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Oct 08 2008 - 05:10:36 PDT
Custom Search