Thanks Francois
I appreciate your quick help ... actually I would prefer to try firstly
Amberff99 which is more related to cornelly et. all amberff94 , but I would
like also to try Amberff03 (Duan et al ff) .. it is rcommended for me to use
amber99 as it is better for drug-protein complex .. what do u think ? are
you from the group which develops AmberFFC?
regards
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:14 AM, FyD <fyd.q4md-forcefieldtools.org> wrote:
> Quoting suhaib sh <suhaib.shekfeh.gmail.com>:
>
> any hints please .. I searched many sites but I found nothing
>>
>
> We have a force field topology database for many coenzymes with Acetyl-CoA
> and more... Which force field do you want to use: the Cornell et al. force
> field or the Duan et al. force field ? If you are interested in I can send
> you the corresponding Tripos mol2 file in private...
> All will be available in R.E.DD.B. .
> http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/REDDB/
>
> regards, Francois
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
> to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Oct 01 2008 - 05:13:10 PDT
