Perhaps MOPAC 7.1 might be a good option if anyone is
interested to switch over. It would seem that this should
work for newer compilers?
http://www.openmopac.net/Downloads/Downloads.html
Cheers,
Thomas
On Fri, 16 May 2008 13:27:40 -0700
"David A. Case" <case.scripps.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, May 16, 2008, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
>>
>> Before performing tests, may I ask why during the
>>compilation both g++ and
>> g77 were used. In particular about g77, should I have
>>indicated ifort as
>> compiler (as I'll do for Amber10 and openmpi)? I was
>>unable to see an option
>> for ifort in place of g77 for the above compilation.
>
> The mopac code does not seem to work with any compilers
>except g77 and
> gfortran. It is slated for removal, so I don't think
>there is any motivation
> for anyone to try to port to other compilers (which I
>think would be
> difficult). Furthermore, for the purposes mopac is
>mostly used for here (to
> help get am1-bcc charges) there is no need for more
>optimization.
>
> ...dac
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body*
>of the email)
> to majordomo.scripps.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" (in the *body* of the email)
to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun May 18 2008 - 06:07:54 PDT
