Re: AMBER: Jarzinsky relationship

From: Adrian Roitberg <roitberg.qtp.ufl.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 10:46:53 -0400

E.M. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am doing some pulling experiments using Jarzinsky's relationship,
> the output file using AMBER9 is something like
>
> x xo whatever work
>
> My question is, do I have to substract the biasing potential after I get
> the output
> or that is taking care of by the program?. I just want to make sure I
> understand
> what is going on here.
>
>
> Regards
>
> E.M.

Hi,

The 'wathever' in the list is the crucial factor, in fact it is the only
one one computes !

It is the external force applied by the external spring (as defined in
the input file). Basically, it is k*(x-x0)

Work is the integral of that force over the run, so there is no need to
subtract the biasing potential. The subtraction would be needed only if
work was computed from the spring energy, which is not.

a.

-- 
                            Dr. Adrian E. Roitberg
                              Associate Professor
               Quantum Theory Project and Department of Chemistry
University of Florida                         PHONE 352 392-6972
P.O. Box 118435                               FAX   352 392-8722
Gainesville, FL 32611-8435                    Email adrian.qtp.ufl.edu
============================================================================
To announce that there must be no criticism of the president,
or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."
   --  Theodore Roosevelt
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu

Received on Wed May 07 2008 - 06:07:23 PDT