Re: AMBER: about glycam06

From: WANG,YING <wangying.ufl.edu>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 22:40:14 -0400 (EDT)

I means that in last mail you said I should sum the three terms.
So I sum the three terms of the 4 parameters to get the actual
potential. Is it right?

Thanks a lot for all of your help!


Ying

On Sat May 03 20:32:10 EDT 2008, "David A. Case"
<case.scripps.edu> wrote:

> On Sat, May 03, 2008, WANG,YING wrote:
>
>> So, like this below:
>> CK CG CG N 1 0.18 0.0 -3
>> 1 0.03 0.0 -2
>> 1 -0.22 0.0 1
>>
>> should be CK CG CG N 3 -0.01 0.0 -4 ?
>> Right?
>
> I don't understand the question. Perhaps looking at the "file
> formats" page
> at the Amber web site would help. I don't know of any errors in
> the glycam
> files, or any reason why they should be modified (if that helps).
>
> ...dac
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
>



--
WANG,YING
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Florida
Office: NEB 139
TEL: 001-352-846-3030
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun May 04 2008 - 06:08:03 PDT
Custom Search