Hi David,
Thanks very much for your prompt response.
The reason is that we can't provide so large a memory required by NMA in CHARMM version we used.
Have a nice day.
---------
Jeffrey
>On Mon, Apr 28, 2008, Jeffrey wrote:
>>
>> I noticed that by setting ismem=1 in AMBER, the memory requirement can
>> be reduced to 1/3, which can be fulfilled by our machines.
>> So I want to know whether AMBER can read the trajectories generated by CHARMM?
>Normal mode caculations use the ismem parameter, which require you to minimize
>a structure first. You could use ptraj to read a CHARMM trajectory, convert
>it to Amber restart format, and give those snapshots to nmode.
>
>> If so, which forcefield should I use?
>It would be better to download AmberTools and use NAB (with a GB forcefield)
>to carry out the normal mode analysis. Of course, mixing a CHARMM-generated
>trajectory (with its forcefields) and an Amber analysis (with different force
>fields) is likely to create data that is difficutl to interpret. Is there a
>reason why you don't want to do the normal mode analysis in CHARMM?
>
>...dac
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>The AMBER Mail Reflector
>To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
>To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
__________________________________________________
¸Ï¿ì×¢²áÑÅ»¢³¬´óÈÝÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä?
http://cn.mail.yahoo.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Apr 30 2008 - 06:07:34 PDT
