On Mon, Apr 28, 2008, Jeffrey wrote:
>
> I noticed that by setting ismem=1 in AMBER, the memory requirement can
> be reduced to 1/3, which can be fulfilled by our machines.
> So I want to know whether AMBER can read the trajectories generated by CHARMM?
Normal mode caculations use the ismem parameter, which require you to minimize
a structure first. You could use ptraj to read a CHARMM trajectory, convert
it to Amber restart format, and give those snapshots to nmode.
> If so, which forcefield should I use?
It would be better to download AmberTools and use NAB (with a GB forcefield)
to carry out the normal mode analysis. Of course, mixing a CHARMM-generated
trajectory (with its forcefields) and an Amber analysis (with different force
fields) is likely to create data that is difficutl to interpret. Is there a
reason why you don't want to do the normal mode analysis in CHARMM?
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Apr 30 2008 - 06:07:26 PDT
