Re: AMBER: Amber9 fails test.parallel

From: Mark Williamson <>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:04:31 +0000

Marc Cozzi wrote:
> rank 0 in job 12 caused collective abort of all
> ranks
> exit status of rank 0: return code 174

Does it fail on the same test every time? What is the topology of your
computer setup?

Off the top of my head, the SIGSEGV signal *could* be indicative of a
memory hardware problem. If this is failing at random points, I'd
suggest burning an image of memtest86+ ( ) to a
CD and then booting the machine in question from that CD. This will run
a series of memory tests on the machine and should give an indication if
there is a memory problem.


The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Sun Feb 03 2008 - 06:07:09 PST
Custom Search