Hello Dr. Case,
Was this recommended to you for sugars or something?
No. 
Today, I run an annealing as you suggested. 
  NSTEP =   100000   TIME(PS) =     400.000  TEMP(K) =     5.85  PRESS =     0.0
 Etot   =       152.2650  EKtot   =         2.5613  EPtot      =       149.7037
 BOND   =        17.4697  ANGLE   =        66.4454  DIHED      =       -12.7984
 1-4 NB =        49.4192  1-4 EEL =      1105.4033  VDWAALS    =       -27.3679
 EELEC  =      -715.6464  EGB     =      -505.0644  RESTRAINT  =       171.8433
 EAMBER (non-restraint)  =       -22.1395
H4   4GB    2 --  H2   4GB    2:    3.751    2.070    1.681   18.038 d    0: 0
Total distance penalty:    171.411
|                               RMS deviation from ideal bonds :      0.0216
|                               RMS deviation from ideal angles :      3.569
There are some distances with high penalty. I deleted about 10 violations. I got the following results. I wonder whether it is appropriate to delete them. I know two NOE assignments are ambiguous, but how about others? Should the final Eptot be minus?
NSTEP =   100000   TIME(PS) =     400.000  TEMP(K) =     5.77  PRESS =     0.0
 Etot   =       -15.6114  EKtot   =         2.5271  EPtot      =       -18.1386
 BOND   =        16.1804  ANGLE   =        54.6413  DIHED      =       -14.7677
 1-4 NB =        45.3959  1-4 EEL =      1126.9869  VDWAALS    =       -35.7446
 EELEC  =      -752.6347  EGB     =      -493.8424  RESTRAINT  =        35.6463
 EAMBER (non-restraint)  =       -53.7849
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 NMR restraints: Bond =   35.646   Angle =     0.000   Torsion =     0.000
===============================================================================
Have a nice weekend.
Wenyong
----- Original Message ----
From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
To: amber.scripps.edu
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:35:37 PM
Subject: Re: AMBER: NMR refinement
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, David A. Case wrote:
I missed one other thing:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008, Wenyong Tong wrote:
> > 
> >   igb=1, saltcon=0.05, offset=0.13,
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^
Why are you setting your own offset???  I would guess that this would
 mess
up the GB energetics of your system quite a bit.  Changing this from
 the
default value is certainly a very advanced step -- was this recommended
 to you
for sugars or something?
...dac
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jan 20 2008 - 06:07:30 PST