Re: AMBER: NMR refinement

From: David A. Case <case.scripps.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:35:37 -0800

On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, David A. Case wrote:

I missed one other thing:

> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008, Wenyong Tong wrote:
> >
> > igb=1, saltcon=0.05, offset=0.13,
                           ^^^^^^^^^^^

Why are you setting your own offset??? I would guess that this would mess
up the GB energetics of your system quite a bit. Changing this from the
default value is certainly a very advanced step -- was this recommended to you
for sugars or something?

...dac

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Jan 20 2008 - 06:07:26 PST
Custom Search