Quoting John Chodera <jchodera.gmail.com>:
> Has anyone developed ff03-consistent parameters/charges for
> phosphorylated amino acids? I've noted at least one published set for
> ff94/ff96/ff99/ff99sb-compatible parameters [1] (conveniently
> collected in the contributed parameters database [2]) but haven't come
> across a ff03-consistent set.
>
> [1] N. Homeyer, A.H.C. Horn, H. Lanig, H. Sticht. AMBER force field
> parameters for phosphorylated amino acids in different protonation
> states: phosphoserine, phosphothreonine, phosphotyrosine and
> phosphohistidine. J. Mol. Model. 2006, 12, 281-289.
> [2] http://pharmacy.man.ac.uk/amber/
Well, you could apply what was done in the ref [1] and available in
[2] to recompute the charges using the parameters used by Duan et al.
For the procedure, see
http://archive.ambermd.org/200712/0239.html
In particular: For information about the Duan et al. FF see:
http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/Tutorial/Tutorial-1.php#7
To compute charge values for central & terminal fragments see:
http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/Tutorial/Tutorial-1.php#10
http://q4md-forcefieldtools.org/Tutorial/Tutorial-1.php#11
regards, Francois
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sat Jan 05 2008 - 00:03:16 PST
