Hi Seth,
I would not use Amber 8 to run QMMM simulations there are numerous problems
with it that it has not been possible to fix. You should upgrade to Amber 9
which has a completely new QMMM implementation.
All the best
Ross
/\
\/
|\oss Walker
| HPC Consultant and Staff Scientist |
| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- ross.rosswalker.co.uk |
|
http://www.rosswalker.co.uk | PGP Key available on request |
Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-amber.scripps.edu
> [mailto:owner-amber.scripps.edu] On Behalf Of Seth Lilavivat
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 13:40
> To: amber.scripps.edu
> Subject: AMBER: AMBER 8: QMMM - molecule fluctuates wildly
>
> Dear Amber Users,
>
> I am running a QMMM MD simulation. The system is 28 atoms large (not
> including waters). When I view the trajectory, the molecule begins to
> oscillate wildly and becomes very distrorted by the end of a 1000fs
> run. I reduced my time step to 0.5 fs but still have the same
> problem. Do I need to put some restraints on my solute? If so, what
> is the syntax for applying a restraint on a set of atoms with the
> ntr=1 option in a QMMM.in file.
>
> Thanks,
> Seth
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Oct 31 2007 - 06:07:38 PDT
