Re: AMBER: ntt parameter in vacuum

From: Carlos Simmerling <carlos.simmerling.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 09:53:16 -0400

Langevin is probably best for this, although experiments in the
gas phase can also have issues with temperature.

On 9/3/07, Age.Skjevik.student.uib.no <Age.Skjevik.student.uib.no> wrote:
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I've run four 200 ps simulations in vacuum (protonated, unprotonated, R,
> S) of a
> small organic molecule called articaine, learning recently that the
> Langevin
> thermostat is not suitable for MD Production when using expicit solvent.
> What is
> the situation like in vacuo? And when using such a small molecule and
> short
> simulation time?
>
> Aage
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Sep 05 2007 - 06:07:18 PDT
Custom Search