From: Ross Walker <>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:19:22 -0700

Hi Thomas,

> Thanks for the reply. I was exactly wondering whether it
> would make it into AMBER 10! If it yields significantly
> better QM/MM as I suspect that it might, perhaps it is
> worth a minor delay.

I'm not sure that we could delay things for this. Or more precisely I can't
ask for a minor delay given that my schedule is so hectic that I could never
give a precise date for which I could have something done. If I got some
peace it could probably be done in a week but the error bars on that, given
everything else I am involved in, are huge / probably + 1year at the worst
case. Key point is that I'd have to add this ad hoc - it involves adding
d-orbital support etc so is not trivial - so I will do my best but it really
will depend on how much free time I have over the coming months.

It may be possible that I post an "update" patch later on at some point but
again I really can't commit to anything here unless someone wants to give me
a nice big grant with which to do it with ;-)

All the best

|\oss Walker

| HPC Consultant and Staff Scientist |
| San Diego Supercomputer Center |
| Tel: +1 858 822 0854 | EMail:- |
| | PGP Key available on request |

Note: Electronic Mail is not secure, has no guarantee of delivery, may not
be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.

The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to
Received on Sun Aug 26 2007 - 06:07:45 PDT
Custom Search