Hi
> Beg pardon for a bureaucratic question:
>
> On 6 August I sent a scanned copy of signed DFTB_license.pdf to the email
> address given in my Amber9 manual (elstner.phys.uni-paderborn.de): non
> answer.
> Should the request be sent by traditional mail or has the email address
> changed?
>
> On the other hand, this question sent to the above address had also no
> answer,
> while address <m.elstner.tu-braunshweig.de>: (found on the web) returned
> unknown.
There is a typo in the address; it should read
m.elstner.tu-braunschweig.de or just m.elstner.tu-bs.de
>
> I would like to compare DFTB with QM-MM/AM1/solvatebox I am carrying out
> extensively.
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
tom
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed Aug 22 2007 - 06:07:12 PDT
