Needing all the time new parameters, I was considering
to apply for Amber9, in view of using antechamber
inside.
I posed a vital question to antechamber directly,
which remained unanswered. It is posed anew here:
I am no Gaussian user, though my QM suite provides ESP
RESP and CRESP very reliably at HF-6-31G* level, with
check of dipole moments for fragment ensemble vs the
intact whole. That said, would antechamber be viable
by providing that way the Partial Charges? I would
like to become an Amber user if that is possible.
Thanks
francesco pietra
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Wed May 23 2007 - 06:07:03 PDT
