1ns is not enough unless the system does not change much or is
very small. how much is "enough" depends on the goal of your simulations.
looking at fluctuations in structure of a large protein is different from
trying to predict structure for a peptide.
On 2/13/07, Catein Catherine <askamber23.hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Sir/Madam,
>
> I read from the literature that implicit solvent models convergent faster,
> just it may reach equilbrium faster than explicit solvent. Thus, I am
> writing to ask what is the typical stimulation time for a system with 700
> residues using implicit solvent (GB) in Amber?
>
> I noted that the potential energy remain more or less constant after 200
> ps,
> then, I run the production period for a further 1 ns. Is it an acceptable
> time for implicit solvent (GB) calculations? if not, how long should be
> used
> for publication purposes?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Catherine.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Learn English via Shopping Game, FREE!
> http://www.linguaphonenet.com/BannerTrack.asp?EMSCode=MSN06-03ETFJ-0211E
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> The AMBER Mail Reflector
> To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
>
--
===================================================================
Carlos L. Simmerling, Ph.D.
Associate Professor Phone: (631) 632-1336
Center for Structural Biology Fax: (631) 632-1555
CMM Bldg, Room G80
Stony Brook University E-mail: carlos.simmerling.gmail.com
Stony Brook, NY 11794-5115
===================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The AMBER Mail Reflector
To post, send mail to amber.scripps.edu
To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe amber" to majordomo.scripps.edu
Received on Sun Feb 18 2007 - 06:07:04 PST
